Archive for May, 2008

New ‘Oasis of the Seas’ (Genesis) Pictures

May 28, 2008

Images courtesy of RCI, taken May 23rd 2008

Below: Is this a building which stands before me?  Oasis of the Seas under construction at Aker Yards in Turku, Finland (images from RCI)

 

 

Below: Inside ‘Central park’.  Is it me or does the ‘Park’ look a bit smaller in reality than it does in the artists renderings? The domed structure on the floor is one of the ’Crystal Canopies’  (covered in protective foil) designed to let light into the ‘Royal Prommenade’ below.

  A video is of the ‘Oasis’ class is available at:

 www.oasisoftheseas.com

You can also see an amazing non-official Carnival Pinnacle video in my ‘pages’ (menu right).

First Image of the Norwegian Cruise Line’s F3

May 24, 2008

NCL have not yet released an official image of their F3 ship. However, this image below has appeared on the internet (source unknown).  Is it a genuine image of an NCL F3 or is it a fake created by somebody good with Photoshop?  Is it an early ship yard ‘concept’ rendering or is it the final design?

 

I have no idea if it is a ‘real’ rendition or not.  (Some say it is a clever composite of other cruise ships). All that I do know is that if it is the final design, externally the F3’s will be a couple of the least attractive cruise ship ever built.  In my opinion they will make the ‘Pride of America’ look like a real beauty in comparison.  In complete contrast, the bigger Royal Caribbean ‘Oasis of the Seas’ (and ‘Allure of the Seas’) will be quite attractive in comparison, for such big ships.

Maybe a hint that this could be a real likeness came from NCL’s CEO Colin Veitch recently when he admitted: “…they (the F3’s) may not end up as the most beautiful ships on the outside. Our goal is to build the best, most innovative ship, not the prettiest to watch sail by.”  Still, that does not mean that the F3’s will not be amazing ships internally and offer a great cruise experience.  After all ‘Do Looks Matter’? (See my post below). 

The image above appeared before the details of some of the open deck spaces were revealed.  Some commentaors have said that small details of the renderings upper deck DO corrolate with the deck space renderings. Personally I’ve no idea?

Here is the official NCL F3 web site: www.f3.ncl.com

Project Genesis: Now known as ‘Oasis of the Seas’ & ‘Allure of the Seas’

May 23, 2008

 It has just been announced that the two Royal Caribbean ‘Project Genesis’ ships will be named ‘Oasis of the Seas’ and ‘Allure of the seas’, in that order.

 

 

Just in case you have had your head burried in the sand of late: When launched in late 2009, the ‘Big O’ (‘Oasis of the Seas’) will be the largest and most revolutionary (according to RCI) cruise ship in the world. She will span 16 decks, encompass 220,000 gross registered tons, carry 5,400 guests, and feature 2,700 staterooms and have it’s own ‘Central park’. The ship will homeport in Port Everglades in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. In 2010, she will be joined by a sister ship, the ‘Bid A’ (‘Allure of the Seas’). The ‘class’ of ship itself will be called the ‘Oasis Class’.

Above: Genesis’s amazing Central Park (Looks a bit like Costa Del Sol holiday apartments)

RCI certainly are the market leaders in innovative ship design and at least the names are original, until they get copied.  I wonder what the two NCL F3 ships will be called: ‘SS Norway’ and ‘SS United States’, I do hope not! Maybe they will be ‘Norwegian Allure’ and ‘Norwegian Oasis’.;)

Above is a picture of Oasis of the Seas under construction at Aker Yards in Turku, Finland – 27 March. The two towers on the upper deck are the balcony cabins overlooking ‘Central Park’. Unfortunately they also overlook other balcony cabins too. You will not get a ‘connection with the sea’ from the balconies, but you will get a ‘connection with the sky’.  If a passenger somehow fell off  their balcony, they certainly would not need the coast guard services.

 (Images courtesy of RCI)

A video is of the ‘Oasis’ class is available at:

 www.oasisoftheseas.com

Do Looks Matter? (Cruise ships that is)

May 21, 2008

Prompted by my speculation  below that the NCL F3’s might well be very ugly ships, this raises an interesting question: “Does the external appearance of a cruise ship actually matter”? I’m sure many of you are thinking: NO, there are many other factors such as interiors, facilities, food and service, ports of call and price which are important to a successful vacation, not the ‘look’ of a ship. After all you do not see the exterior of a ship when you are on board do you?

Below:  Not a great beauty? Ventura in the English Channel  12th Jun2 08 (Photo by me)

It would also appear that the cruise lines do not think ‘looks’ are important either, judging by the number of new ‘boxy’ shaped cruise ships. Their vast walls of balconies make their ships resemble office blocks rather than nautical vessels. I assume that this is simply because a box type superstructure provides the maximum space for cabins and public rooms, which in turn generate income.

Now I appreciate that beauty really is in the eye of the beholder, but most of the members agree that ships like ‘Normandie’, France’ and ‘Queen Elizabeth 2′ for example, are infinitely more attractive than all ships built in the past few decades. There is of course the odd exception, ‘Queen Mary 2′, is considered to be more attractive than most other modern ships. Her impressive bow and step-down fantail cleverly detracts from the now obligatory balcony cabins in between.

Below: Cunard’s ‘Queen Mary 2′, now that’s a better looking ship!

Most new ships have sterns that look like the back of a bus when compared to the sterns of the great ocean liners. A fantail and a slender superstructure just do not maximize profit.

Funnels are no longer things of beauty either. In the past, they used to represent power and speed. For shipping companies, the more funnels the better. “Titanic’ for example had four funnels, three were real and one was a fake. Just look at the ‘SS United States’, her two funnels were on steroids. On today’s ships the single funnel is often just a geometric collection of exhaust pipes and vents. Royal Caribbean’s even have climbing walls up the side of them.

Now maybe I’m a bit odd, but for me looks do matter. I could not book a cruise on an ugly ship. In the same way I could not buy a car which I though was ugly or in a colour that I disliked. Now I admit that I have sailed a few ships which were ‘the girl next door’ in terms of looks, rather than ’sexy’, but never ugly.

Each year more old tonnage is sent to the breakers yard and more newbuilds arrive so you might think that I am in danger of running out of ‘beautiful’ ships to cruise on.

Below: QE2, many would say an even better looking ship.

Fortunately the definition of ‘beautiful’ can change over time. For example P&O’s ‘Oriana’ (1995) and ‘Aurora’ (2000) both looked a bit ‘too modern’ or even ‘unsightly’, when they entered service, compared to the classics ‘Victoria’ and ‘Canberra’. However with the passage of time they both now look like ‘classics’ in their own right, when compared to the new and forthcoming additions to the P&O fleet.

A ‘classic’ only becomes a ‘classic’ when time has passed. Many of today’s newbuilds, by definition, will be tomorrow’s ‘classics’. Inevitably, a few years from now we will again be complaining that the new ships are not as attractive as the ones that came before.

(Comments welcome, no need to join to comment!)

NCL F3’s: A New Wave of Ship Design

May 21, 2008

What an exciting month April 2008 was for both British and global cruise ship enthusiasts:

On April 7th P&O’s ‘Ventura’ (the largest cruise ship dedicated to the British market) arrived at her home port of Southampton for the first time. Ventura was officially christened by actress Dame Helen Mirren with some help. Two SAS Marines repelled down the bow of the ship and manually broke a bottle each, ensuring no embarrassment from a bottle of bubbly bouncing off the side of the ship.

 On April 15th Royal Caribbean revealed some features of their forthcoming Ultra-ship ‘Genesis’ which includes ‘Central Park’ (an open area with real grass and trees) and the ‘Rising Tide bar’, a bar which rises vertically into the air (Speaking for myself, when a bar starts to move, that’s when I stop drinking and leave.)

 On April 22nd we had a ‘twice in a lifetime’ moment when the three Cunard Queen’s (Queen Elizabeth 2, Queen Mary and Queen Victoria) met at Southampton for the first time. However it wasn’t a “first” first as the three Queens had previously met in New York on January 13th.

 On April 25th the world’s biggest cruise ship, Royal Caribbean’s ‘Independence of the Seas’, docked at Southampton to prepare for her season of cruises from the U.K. She made the QE2 which was also in Southampton that day looked like a tender.

Each of the above events received significant media coverage on TV, radio and in print. However on April 24th we received some interesting news from the Norwegian Cruise Line (NCL) which was not so well publicized. Never the less, NCL’s announcement was quite significant for ship aficionados. That is because the news concerned details of the staterooms to be featured on board NCL’s two ‘F3′ newbuilds. Towards the end of the decade, NCLwill be competing directly with Carnival and Royal Caribbean by introducing their first two mega ships, Each ship will be 150,000gt vessels, and will offer 4,200 lower berths when they are delivered in 2009 and 2010.

NCL president and CEO Colin Veitchhad tantalized the media at the Miami ‘Seatrade’ show earlier in the year by saying: “The ships will have no main dining room, no theater, no Lido Café and be without a traditional cruise ship cabin”.  At the time everyone was trying to guess what all this meant, but in last week’s announcement NCL shed some light on their new cabin design.

New Wave BalconyThe cabins on board modern ships are relatively similar to each other in design, irrespective of which cruise line you choose.  Sure there are some variations in the size  and décor but essentially the majority os standard grades are rectangular rooms. 

in recent years NCL have demonstrated that it more than capable of ‘thinking outside the box’. This statement became literal when they announced that the staterooms on the F3’s will be based on a ‘New Wave’ concept which feature more curves than ‘Beyonce’.

According to NCL, the “New Wave” cabin walls will be a curve shaped rather than the straight lines that make up the cabin walls of just about any other ship. Even the dressing units and beds will have curves.

 NCL revealed three basic grades of cabins: the New Wave standard, New Wave balcony and New Wave deluxe.

New Wave BalconySome of the cabins have an interlocking design where one cabin is the mirror image of its partner, a design feature which was common place on the ships of old (albeit with straight lines), but not so common now. The décor is rather toned down compared to NCL’s other newbuilds, or as NCL put its “…a sophisticated earth-tone palette accented with a splash of colour and rich, dark wood”. There will also be concealed contour LED lighting and back-lit domed ceilings to generate a relaxing atmosphere. However, the most radical design feature is the fact that they have separated the shower/or bath tub and water closet (toilet) either side of the entry “hall”. It’s not clear how big the two bathroom spaces will be or what type of doors or dividers that they will have (possible opaque glass sliding doors). However a hanging curtain is available to separate these two areas from the rest of the cabin. In addition, within the main cabin space, there will be a vanity sink. This is a throwback to the past, as many of the great Ocean Liners, like the ‘Queen Mary’ of 1934 had sinks in some of the higher class cabins outside of the bathroom. (There has been some critisim on hygine grounds about the sink being away from the toilet, but I’m not clear if these are really valid).

All of the 1,415 outside cabins will have balconies, but there will be inside cabins too.

Following NCL’s announcement there has been significant debate about the level of privacy available in the F3 cabins given the fact that anyone entering or leaving the cabin must pass through the bathroom spaces. Of course this design has the great advantage in that the different cabin occupants can perform different bodily functions all at the same time. There is no information to how big the various cabin grades will be but given the fact that the F3’s will be relatively high density ship, we can expect the standard grades will b relatively small. The ‘curves’ may well be a clever way to make the cabins feel more spacious. We are also expecting multiple dining and entertainment venues on board the F3’s. The external appearance of these ships is still a secret, but ‘Pride of America’ was no beauty and rumor has it that the F3’s may well be the ugliest ships afloat!

It is interesting to note that when Celebrity Cruise Lines was boasting about the stateroom design on board their new Solstice-class ships, the revealed that they had asked a panel of five women to help design the staterooms. I have seen an artist’s renditions of Celebrities ‘Aqua-Class’ staterooms and they do look very nice, but on the face of it they do not look particularly different in layout and décor from those on board any other modern ship. Maybe the devil is in the detail? However NCL have stolen Celebrities thunder and have come up with something which is genuinely different from the current norm.

Let the battle for the high seas commence.